Acetylated wood is solid timber chemically modified so that it takes up far less water than ordinary wood. Designers meet it in exterior cladding, decking, windows and doors, and in some structural and water-contact uses.
This guide sets out what Accsys's own documents (2020 editions, with the 2025–2026 editions where they differ), an ICC-ES evaluation report, two 2026 EPDs and one independent review abstract say, and where they stop. Nearly every performance number comes from the manufacturer, so we label it as such. We found no other producer of acetylated solid timber in the documents we read, so there is no cross-manufacturer comparison.
What is acetylated wood and how is it made?
Acetyl groups replace hydroxyl groups
The Accsys guide explains that hydroxyl groups in wood attract water, which makes cellulose swell and shrink and makes the wood more open to attack by organisms. Acetylation reacts wood with acetic anhydride at high temperature to raise the level of acetyl groups, which repel water.[1] The guide says the wood is modified uniformly through the cross section and the entire cell wall structure is altered.[1] This is Accsys's description of its own process. A 2017 iForest review places acetylation among the chemical wood-modification processes, alongside furfurylation and resin impregnation, and also discusses how to assess the environmental impact of modification processes. We read its abstract only.[10]
Process and by-products
In the Kingsport EPD, wood goes into a reactor with acetic anhydride for vacuum-pressure impregnation, about 18 hours at up to 155 °C, and is then dried in a kiln.[4] The finished product is described as more than 99 % acetylated wood and less than 1 % acetic acid by mass.[4] The 2015 EPD describes the Arnhem plant as an industrial symbiosis of acetic anhydride and acetic acid production, and allocates the by-product acetic acid economically between Accoya and the acid.[6] The ICC-ES report says any softwood or hardwood able to reach the minimum bound-acetyl level in its Table 1 can be used, so the process is not tied to pine in that document.[7]
Residual acetic acid
The guide says Accoya contains a small amount of residual acetic acid, and that batches are released only if the average residual acetyl compounds are 1.0 % or less (mass per oven-dry wood mass) and no individual sample exceeds 1.8 %.[1] In wet conditions the wood has a pH of 4 to 5.5 in the guide's words, and the guide compares its acid level with oak and western red cedar.[1] This matters for metals, sealants and adhesives, covered below.
How does acetylated wood perform?
Durability and use classes
Accsys's documents state durability class 1 under EN 350, with a laboratory test to EN 113 and ENV 807 and a field test to EN 252.[1][2] EN 350 and EN 335 are the European standards for durability classification and use classes; we read only their catalogue entries.[11][12] The guide says Accoya is suitable for use classes 1 to 4, which run from dry interior to ground or fresh-water contact.[1] The warranty is 50 years above ground and 25 years in ground or fresh water, and it does not cover attack by marine organisms.[1][4] The German structural approval (DIBt) described in Accsys's test summary allows outdoor use up to use class 3.2 provided dirt does not accumulate, and says use class 3.2 needs professional design including end-grain sealing.[3] We did not read the DIBt approval, the FCBA certificate or the warranty. The test summary reports results from several institutes, including a 15- and 20-year Dutch canal-lining test and a 10-year Whakarewarewa field test; the January 2026 edition reports the canal tests at 21 and 26 years, inspected in 2021. We did not open the underlying reports.[3][15]
Termites and insects
The test summary reports termite trials by LSU (Formosan termites), Timber Products Inspection in Florida, the Australian Forest Research Company and a university in Thailand, with mean mass loss of 0.2 to 0.7 % for Accoya against 82.6 % for untreated radiata sapwood in the Australian above-ground trial, and says it expects good performance south of the Tropic of Capricorn there.[3] Its FCBA table lists both “not degraded by European subterranean termites” and “susceptible to termite degradation” under its EN 117 and EN 118 tests; the extracted text did not let us match each statement to a test, so we do not draw a conclusion from that table.[3]
Dimensional stability
Accsys documents give oven dry to wet dimensional change of 0.7 % radial and 1.5 % tangential, and 0.4 % and 0.8 % from wet to 65 % RH.[1][2] The guide's movement table uses a different basis (typical characteristic values, green to oven dry, citing an SHR report): 0.8 % radial and 1.6 % tangential for Accoya against 3.4 % and 7.9 % for untreated radiata pine, with a warranty maximum of 2.5 % for Accoya.[1] We do not mix the two bases. The Teknos coating test (started March 2009) summarised by Accsys reports that after 10 years of natural exposure without maintenance, the coating on Accoya boards showed no significant deterioration, while the coating on western red cedar and Siberian larch had lost its protective function.[3] Remmers maintenance schedules cited in the same summary go up to 10 years for translucent and 12 years for opaque finishes.[3] These are Accsys-reported results.
Strength
The DIBt approval qualifies A1-grade Accoya as strength class C22 and A2 as C16 under EN 338, for widths of 100 to 250 mm and thicknesses of 25 to 100 mm, in service classes 1 to 3 and for static or quasi-static loads, with fatigue-relevant stresses excluded.[1][3] B grade is not strength graded.[1] Accsys states in its FCBA table that the process does not affect mechanical properties; the test summary also reports Timber Products Inspection's conclusion that Accoya's modulus of rupture and work to maximum load are slightly higher and its average modulus of elasticity slightly lower than untreated radiata pine, with the values shown only in a chart, which we did not read.[3] The table below shows how the strength figures change basis from document to document.
Where the Accsys documents differ
All four columns come from one manufacturer, so this is not a cross-product comparison. Values measured to different standards or on different bases are kept in their own cells and not reconciled; the 2015 EPD's strength values are labelled EN 310 and the FCBA values are 5-percentile figures, which are not the same as an average or a characteristic value. The table uses the 2020 editions; Accsys's August 2025 datasheet gives an average density of 515 kg/m³ and Class D or E in Europe (see the fact sheet).[14]
| Property | Data sheet (Accsys, 2020) [2] | Wood Information Guide V3.9 (Accsys, 2020) [1] | Accsys Performance Testing Summary V4.0, 2020 (FCBA table unless stated) [3] | Norwegian EPD, 2015 (Accsys) [6] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | Average 510 kg/m³, range 400 to 600, at 65 % RH and 20 °C | 515 ± 80 kg/m³ at 65 % RH and 20 °C | Average 500 kg/m³ at 20 °C and 65 % RH; characteristic 417 kg/m³ (BRL 0605) | 510 kg/m³ (ISO 3131) for radiata pine; 540 for Scots pine, 755 for beech |
| Thermal conductivity | λ = 0.12 W/m·K (EN 12667); 0.102 W/m·K (ASTM C177) | 0.12 W/m·K (EN 12667); 0.10 W/m·K (ASTM C-177) | 0.12 W/m·K (EN 12664) | 0.12 W/m·K via EN 12667 |
| Equilibrium moisture content | 3–5 % at 65 % RH, 20 °C | 3–5 % at 65 % RH, 20 °C | 4.5 % at 65 % RH; 7.5 % at 95 %; 2.5 % at 35 % (average during drying at 20 °C, BRL 0605) | 3–5 % at 65 % RH, 20 °C |
| Dimensional change, oven dry to wet | Radial 0.7 %, tangential 1.5 % (labelled shrinkage); wet to 65 % RH: 0.4 % and 0.8 % | Radial 0.7 %, tangential 1.5 % (labelled shrinkage, ISO 4469); wet to 65 % RH: 0.4 % and 0.8 % | Average shrinkage radial 0.7 %, tangential 1.5 % (BRL 0605) | Radial 0.7 %, tangential 1.5 % (labelled swelling) |
| Durability class | EN 350 class 1 | Class 1 in EN 113 (EN 84), ENV 807 and EN 252; class 1 for use classes 1–4 under EN 350-1 and EN 335-1 | Class 1 (NF EN 350), after leaching (EN 84); suitable for use classes 1–4 (EN 335) | Class 1 (EN 350, EN 113, ENV 807) |
| Strength and stiffness | Bending stiffness 8,800 N/mm² (EN 408); A1 grade C22, A2 grade C16 | Characteristic values for C22 and C16 (EN 338); mean modulus of elasticity 10 and 8 kN/mm² | 5-percentile values (EN 408): modulus of elasticity 5,290 MPa, bending strength 22.4 MPa | Bending strength 80 N/mm² and stiffness 8,790 N/mm² (both labelled EN 310) |
| Reaction to fire | Class C in the USA (ASTM E84) and D in Europe (printed “EN149915”) | ASTM E84 flame spread 95, smoke developed 155; Euroclass D through EN 14915, for the cladding system | Not in the FCBA table. Elsewhere in the summary: ASTM E84 Class C (index values only in a chart); a note citing “European classification D in EN14915”; DIBt section: normal flammable class B2 (DIN 4102-1) | not stated |
What do acetic acid and low moisture content mean for fixings, glue and coatings?
Metals. The guide says tests showed base metals and galvanised metals in direct or indirect contact with wood containing acids corrode in damp conditions, and strongly recommends stainless steel, corrosion-resistant aluminium or naval brass where moisture or condensation is present.[1] It recommends EN 10088-1 stainless steel, 1.4301 (A2) or 1.4401 (A4), with A4 for coastal or heavily polluted areas, and says galvanised metals or zinc alloys are not corrosion-proof with Accoya.[1] The ICC-ES report limits fasteners to Type 304 and 316 stainless steel and requires flashing or another non-corrosive barrier between Accoya and damp cement-based materials.[7] The guide adds that acetic acid can concentrate in confined spaces such as lock housings.[1]
Adhesives. According to the data sheet, polyurethane, EPI, epoxy and PRF adhesives give the best results, PVAc results vary greatly and MUF adhesives should be avoided.[2] The guide says adhesives that need moisture to harden can be affected by the particularly low moisture content, and that acid-catalysed adhesives need advice from the adhesive supplier.[1]
Sealants and coatings. The guide says rare cases are known where residual acetic acid influenced the curing or long-term performance of sealants, and strongly recommends a compatibility check by the sealant supplier for glazing and double-glazing sealants; a primer can improve adhesion on unfinished wood.[1] The data sheet states that most commonly used coating systems can be used.[2] Exposure to products above pH 9 can invalidate the warranty in the guide's words, and some fire retardants may too.[1]
How does acetylated wood behave in fire?
The Accsys guide says Accoya falls within EN 14915, the harmonised standard for solid wood panelling and cladding, whose excerpt in the guide gives D-s2, d0 for boards of at least 390 kg/m³ above stated thicknesses and D-s2, d2 for the thinnest listed boards, and that the property covers the entire cladding system including fasteners, detailing, sub-frame and cavity.[1] It says untreated chemically modified wood is classed D like other softwoods, that fire-retardant treatment can reach up to class B, and that the retardant's effect on this wood must be proven by an independent accredited body.[1] Accsys's January 2026 guide changes this picture: it says that since August 2024 testing with the SBI test (EN 13823) and the single-flame-source test is required to classify any modified, preservative-treated or coated wood cladding, that Accoya boards of average density were rated Class E as 19 mm tongue-and-groove boards over a ventilated 40 mm cavity, about 5 % from the Class D threshold, and that Class D can be reached in some set-ups, such as 22 mm or thicker square-edged boards, a charred finish on 21 mm boards, intumescent or other fire-retardant coatings, or 15 or 19 mm profiles with a fire-retardant impregnation; it adds that the cladding manufacturer is responsible for the system's classification.[13] The August 2025 datasheet gives Class D or E depending on thickness, profile and construction.[14] We did not read EN 14915, EN 13501-1 or the classification reports the guide mentions. In the US, both guides report flame spread 95 and smoke developed 155 under ASTM E84, against 70 to 100 for several other woods in their table (southern pines 103 to 195).[1][13]
How much carbon does acetylated wood hold?
What the EPDs show
We read two 2026 Accsys EPDs from SCS Global Services covering four products; SCS's directory also lists a third, SCS-EPD-10639 for Accoya Europe, which we did not read.[16] Both are product-specific, cradle-to-gate with end-of-life and module D, based on 2024–2025 manufacturer data and PCR 2019:14 v2.0.1 (the Kingsport EPD prints the PCR's validity both as 2025 and 2030, the Color EPD as 2025).[4][5] The Kingsport EPD names Lindita Bushi of the Athena Sustainable Materials Institute as verifier.[4] The A1–A3 GWP-total is positive, because fossil emissions exceed the biogenic uptake, and the EPD's interpretation says A1 is driven by the upstream production of acetic anhydride and A3 by steam and electricity at Kingsport.[4]
| Product and plant | Declared unit | GWP-total A1–A3 | GWP-fossil / GWP-biogenic A1–A3 | GWP-total C4 / GWP-biogenic C4 | GWP-total D | Src |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accoya Wood, rough sawn, Accoya USA, Kingsport (SCS-EPD-10640) | 1 m³ (515 kg) | 259 | +1,060 / −816 | 170 / 850 | −934 | [4] |
| Accoya Wood, planed, Kingsport (SCS-EPD-10640) | 1 m³ (515 kg) | 323 | +1,130 / −816 | 170 / 850 | −934 | [4] |
| Accoya Color, rough sawn, Accoya Color UK, Barry (SCS-EPD-10638) | 1 m³ (515 kg) | 523 | +1,280 / −816 | 74.0 / 840 | −474 | [5] |
| Accoya Color, profiled, Barry (SCS-EPD-10638) | 1 m³ (515 kg) | 524 | +1,280 / −816 | 74.0 / 840 | −474 | [5] |
All values are kg CO₂e per m³ as printed, and the stages are declared separately. The Kingsport EPD says that use of the aggregated A1–A3 stage is discouraged without considering end of life, and we do not add the stages.[4] We re-read the result tables (text and rendered page) and the printed components do not add up to the printed totals: for Accoya rough from Kingsport, A1–A3 GWP-fossil 1,060 + GWP-biogenic −816 + GWP-luluc 0.774 = 244.8, against a printed GWP-total of 259; for Color rough, 1,280 − 816 + 0.869 = 464.9, against 523. Module C4 shows the same pattern: 5.51 + 850 + 0.003 = 855.5 against a printed 170 for Kingsport, and 2.56 + 840 = 842.6 against 74.0 for Color. We report all figures as printed, do not say which is intended, and have not been able to ask Accsys or SCS.
Read the number with care
The Kingsport end-of-life scenario is 515 kg collected with mixed construction waste, of which 46.4 kg is recycled, 92.7 kg incinerated and 376 kg sent to final deposition, with a biogenic carbon removal of 827 kg CO₂ shown; the Color scenario is 271, 37.9 and 206 kg.[4][5] Module D is negative (−934 and −474) because the EPDs credit substitution of virgin wood and exported energy; the Kingsport EPD says the primary raw material inputs are 100 % virgin wood.[4] The Color EPD says Accsys buys renewable energy certificates, which are included in its figures, and offsets some emissions, which are not.[5] The EPDs warn that EPDs based on different PCRs or calculation models may not be comparable.[4][5] The EPDs for thermally modified wood on this site come from other programme operators and declare negative A1–A3 totals per m³ for a different product, so we do not set the figures side by side.
The 2015 Norwegian EPD is older (EN 15804+A1, issue and validity fields blank in the copy we read) and declares radiata, Scots pine and beech products.[6] On 14 October 2026 the EPD-Global (formerly EPD-Norway) list returned no entry for NEPD-376-262 or for Accsys as owner; we could not tell whether that list shows expired declarations, and we do not use its figures. Its text states an expected service life of 60 years for external cladding and decking more than 20 cm above ground.[6]
Which certificates apply?
Accsys's Cradle to Cradle Certified certificates are Full Scope Gold, standard version 3.1, for Accoya Wood and for Accoya Color, both assessed for professional installers only; the Accoya Wood certificate expires on 1 November 2026, less than three weeks after this page's date, and the Accoya Color one on 7 November 2026. The C2C registry entries, checked on 14 October 2026, show the same dates and also list Material Health Platinum for both.[8][16] The FSC chain-of-custody certificate lists dimensional timber and solid wood among its product groups and says the certificate alone is not evidence that a given product is FSC-certified; FSC Search showed it as valid on 14 October 2026.[9][16] We read no PEFC certificate; the 2015 EPD lists FSC and PEFC chain-of-custody certificates among the production facility's certificates.[6] The ICC-ES report evaluates the wood for above-ground and ground-contact use as preservative-treated wood under US codes, with fasteners limited to Types 304 and 316 stainless steel.[7] For structural use the DIBt approval and the FCBA certificate described by Accsys are summarised above; we did not open either.[3]
When to specify it, and when not
Where the documents support it
- Cladding, decking and joinery where movement and coating life matter. The data sheet gives 0.7 % radial and 1.5 % tangential oven dry to wet change and says no finish is needed for longevity and stability, and Accsys reports a 10-year coating test and Remmers maintenance schedules favourable to Accoya.[2][3] For comparison, our thermally modified wood profile reports that the ThermoWood handbook recommends a surface treatment for weather-exposed use.
- Ground or fresh-water contact. Accsys warrants 25 years in ground or fresh water, and its summaries cite a Dutch canal test inspected at 20 years (2020 edition) and 26 years (2026 edition); ICC-ES evaluates it for ground contact under US codes.[1][3][15][7] The thermally modified wood profile reports that the ThermoWood handbook does not recommend contact with soil or water.
- Structural members within the approved sizes and static loading. DIBt-approved strength classes C22 and C16 exist for A1 and A2 grades, in the stated section sizes, in service classes 1 to 3, for static or quasi-static loads.[1][3] For large spans or members outside those sizes, the documents we read give no basis; see glulam and cross-laminated timber. We found no sourced comparison of Accoya's structural performance with them.
Where it may not suit, or needs extra care
- Hardware and fixings. Stainless steel (304 or 316; A2 or A4 in the guide) or equally resistant metals are needed, and ordinary or galvanised steel is not recommended; the guide advises isolating less resistant hardware and warns of confined spaces such as lock housings and non-ventilated humid rooms.[1][7]
- Glazing, sealants and glued assemblies. Ask the sealant and adhesive suppliers for compatibility with acetylated wood; the documents we read call for a check, not a universal pass.[1][2]
- Fire. The classification belongs to the whole cladding system in Accsys's guides, and retardants may affect coatings, adhesives and the warranty.[1] The 2026 guide reports Class E in one common build-up and Class D only in some set-ups.[13] Where Class D or higher is required, specify a tested system.
- Marine and tropical conditions. The warranty does not cover attack by marine organisms, and the ICC-ES report requires the ground-contact treatment level for above-ground uses in tropical climates.[1][7]
- Appearance. The guide says uncoated boards bleach and then grey, may look blotchy in between, grow surface mould in damp or shaded places, and can show rare reddish-brown extractive stains or green stains from copper preservatives in a sub-frame; boards have a discoloured zone up to about 6 mm deep from the process.[1]
- Carbon. The A1–A3 figure is positive in Accsys's EPDs, driven by acetic anhydride, steam and electricity; the net depends on end of life.[4] Treat any carbon claim as an EPD-by-EPD question, not a material property.
What we could not support
The documents we read give no guidance on climate zones beyond the termite note and the marine caveat, and no independent field data on service life beyond Accsys's test summary. We found no price, installation-cost or maintenance-cost figures and do not give any.
Where is acetylated wood used, and who makes it?
The 2026 EPDs name decking, cladding, siding, windows and doors as applications.[4][5] We found no project documents we could verify for this profile, so it has no projects section. Accsys's resources page also lists a Tricoya flyer, an acetylated wood-fibre product; we did not read it and it is outside this profile.
Suppliers whose documents we read
Producers selected by our editors and checked against company documents and certificate records where available.
| Supplier | Products | Country | Certifications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accsys Technologies (a trading name of Titan Wood Limited, per its data sheet)[2] | Accoya Wood (acetylated solid wood, rough sawn and finger-jointed) and Accoya Color (pigmented) | Headquarters London; plants named in the documents: Arnhem (Netherlands), Kingsport, Tennessee (Accoya USA), Barry (Wales, Accoya Color UK) | EPDs SCS-EPD-10640 and SCS-EPD-10638, valid 8 May 2026 to 7 May 2031 in SCS's directory · Cradle to Cradle Certified Gold certificates 7228 (Accoya Wood, expires 1 Nov 2026) and 7120 (Accoya Color, expires 7 Nov 2026) · FSC chain of custody CU-COC-807363, valid to 12 July 2027 · ICC-ES ESR-2825, reissued October 2025.[4][5][7][8][9][16] |
Status of these records, checked 14 October 2026: the SCS Certified Green Products Guide lists both EPDs with the dates above; the Cradle to Cradle registry shows certificates 7228 and 7120 valid until 1 and 7 November 2026; FSC Search shows CU-COC-807363 as valid; ICC-ES lists ESR-2825 in its reports directory. The 2015 Norwegian EPD did not appear in the EPD-Global list. The Cradle to Cradle certificates expire within weeks of this check; confirm renewal before specifying. We found no other producer of acetylated solid timber. Listing policy: editorial selection, not paid.
Frequently asked questions about acetylated wood
What is acetylated wood?
Solid wood reacted with acetic anhydride so that acetyl groups replace some of the water-attracting hydroxyl groups in the cell wall. Accsys, whose Accoya is the product we found documents for, describes the change as running through the whole cross section, not only the surface.
How durable is acetylated wood?
Accsys's documents state EN 350 durability class 1 and suitability for use classes 1 to 4 under EN 335, and Accsys warrants 50 years above ground and 25 years in ground or fresh water. The class and warranty are manufacturer statements: we did not read the FCBA certificate or the warranty itself.
Can I use ordinary steel fixings with acetylated wood?
No. The Accsys guide says wood containing acids corrodes base and galvanised metals in damp conditions and strongly recommends stainless steel (1.4301 or 1.4401), naval brass or suitable aluminium. The ICC-ES report limits fasteners to Type 304 and 316 stainless steel.
Is acetylated wood fire resistant?
Not beyond ordinary timber, in Accsys's documents. Its 2020 guide states Euroclass D for untreated cladding through EN 14915; its 2026 guide says modified wood now needs testing and reports Class E for 19 mm tongue-and-groove boards, with Class D possible in some build-ups. Its US test gave a flame spread index of 95 (ASTM E84, Class C). Fire retardants can raise the class but may affect the warranty.
Does acetylated wood have a low carbon footprint?
The Accsys EPDs declare A1–A3 GWP-total of +259 kg CO₂e per m³ for rough Accoya from Kingsport, made of +1,060 fossil and −816 biogenic. The same EPD models a +850 biogenic return at end of life (module C4), and it discourages using A1–A3 on its own.
Does acetylated wood need a finish?
Not for durability or dimensional stability, according to the Accsys data sheet. Uncoated boards weather to a silvery grey, and the guide warns of surface mould in damp or shaded places. Accsys reports that coatings last longer on it than on other woods.
The bottom line on acetylated wood
Acetylated wood, as Accsys documents it, is a stable, class 1 durable timber for exterior cladding, decking, joinery and some structural uses. Its trade-offs are practical: stainless fixings, sealant and glue checks, fire classification that needs a tested system, and a positive production-stage carbon figure in the EPDs we read. Ask for the batch's durability documentation, the current EPD and certificates, the fire test for your build-up and the fixing specification.
Related materials
Sources
- Accsys Technologies (2020). Accoya® Wood Information Guide, V3.9. Source of the process description, residual acid limits, durability class and use-class statements, warranty, property table, DIBt strength classes, fasteners, sealants, adhesives, weathering, end of life and fire sections. Manufacturer document; full text read from a distributor-hosted copy. Superseded on accoya.com by V4.0 (January 2026) [13]; the fire section differs and both are shown. PDF (internationaltimber.com)
- Accsys Technologies (2020, copyright date printed). Accoya® wood data sheet (sizes, grades, key properties, gluing, finishing, fastening). Manufacturer document; full text read from a distributor-hosted copy (file J00365). Superseded on accoya.com by the August 2025 datasheet [14]. PDF (internationaltimber.com)
- Accsys Technologies (July 2020). Accoya® Performance Testing Summary, V4.0. Summarises Accsys-reported tests by named institutes, the DIBt and FCBA certifications, the ICC-ES report and flame-spread test. Manufacturer brochure; text read, chart values not read; the underlying test reports were not opened. A January 2026 edition is on accoya.com [15]. PDF (whitmores.co.uk, distributor copy)
- Accsys (2026). Environmental Product Declaration, Accoya Wood (rough sawn and planed), Accoya USA, Kingsport. SCS-EPD-10640, SCS Global Services, EN 15804-based, PCR 2019:14 v2.0.1, declared unit 1 m³ (515 kg), v1.2 issue date printed 08.13.2026, validity printed 05.08.2026 to 05.07.2031, verifier Lindita Bushi (Athena Sustainable Materials Institute). Manufacturer-owned, third-party verified; text and result tables read (results table also checked as a rendered page); listed in SCS's directory, checked 14 October 2026 [16]. PDF (accoya.com)
- Accsys (2026). Environmental Product Declaration, Accoya Color (rough sawn and profiled), Accoya Color UK, Barry. SCS-EPD-10638, SCS Global Services, same PCR and unit, same dates printed. Manufacturer-owned, third-party verified; text and result tables read; listed in SCS's directory, checked 14 October 2026 [16]. PDF (accoya.com)
- Accsys Technologies PLC (2015). Environmental Product Declaration, Accoya Wood, decking, cladding and planed timber for joinery applications, NEPD-376-262-EN, EPD Norway, EN 15804+A1, author Joost Vogtländer. Older declaration; the copy we read (NOBB, 3 August 2025) leaves the issue and validity fields blank and some result cells garbled, so we use only its text statements (page 6 checked as a rendered page for the M1 statement). Not found in the EPD-Global list on 14 October 2026. PDF (byggtjeneste.no)
- ICC Evaluation Service (reissued October 2025). Evaluation report ESR-2825, Accoya acetylated wood, report holder Accoya USA; subject to renewal October 2027. Independent evaluation against US codes; pages 1 to 4 read (scope, material, fasteners, conditions of use, Tables 1 and 2); listed in the ICC-ES reports directory, checked 14 October 2026. PDF (icc-es.org)
- Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute, certificates for Accsys Technologies: Accoya Wood, certification 7228, Gold, standard 3.1, effective 10 July 2024, expires 1 November 2026; Accoya Color, certification 7120, effective 1 October 2024, expires 7 November 2026. Copies on Accsys's page; registry entries checked 14 October 2026 [16]. Accoya Wood certificate · Accoya Color certificate
- Control Union Certifications B.V. (issued 19 January 2026). FSC Chain of Custody certificate CU-COC-807363 for Titan Wood Limited h.o.d.n. Accsys Technologies, valid until 12 July 2027. Copy on Accsys's page; FSC Search checked 14 October 2026 [16]. PDF (accoya.com)
- Sandberg, D., Kutnar, A. & Mantanis, G. (2017). "Wood modification technologies - a review." iForest 10(6):895–908. Peer-reviewed review; bibliographic data confirmed via Crossref; abstract read at iforest.sisef.org, full text not accessed, and the abstract gives no acetylation details beyond the list of process types. doi:10.3832/ifor2380-010
- Estonian Centre for Standardisation and Accreditation (EVS), catalogue page for EVS-EN 350:2016, "Durability of wood and wood-based products - Testing and classification of the durability to biological agents of wood and wood-based materials", valid from 05.09.2016. Catalogue page only; the standard text was not read. evs.ee
- EVS, catalogue page for EVS-EN 335:2013, "Durability of wood and wood-based products - Use classes: definitions, application to solid wood and wood-based products", valid from 02.04.2013. Catalogue page only; the standard text was not read. evs.ee
- Accsys (January 2026). Accoya Wood Information Guide, version 4.0. Manufacturer document; read for the fire behaviour (European and US classification), durability, residual acid, metals, sealant and dimensional-stability sections. PDF (accoya.com)
- Accsys Technologies (August 2025). Accoya datasheet, version 1001, EN/UK. Manufacturer document; full text read. PDF (accoya.com)
- Accsys (January 2026). Accoya Performance Testing Summary, EN/UK. Manufacturer brochure; text read for the canal-lining, FCBA and DIBt sections; underlying reports not opened. PDF (accoya.com)
- Registry checks, 14 October 2026: SCS Certified Green Products Guide entries for Accoya US (SCS-EPD-10640), Accoya Color (SCS-EPD-10638) and Accoya Europe (SCS-EPD-10639), each listed 2026.05.08 to 2031.05.07; Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Registry entries for Accoya Wood (7228, valid until 1 November 2026) and Accoya Color (7120, valid until 7 November 2026); FSC Search for CU-COC-807363 (status valid, licence FSC-C012330). SCS entry · C2C Accoya Wood · C2C Accoya Color · FSC Search